[Chaos-l] Wil Tirion's _The Cambridge Star Atlas_
Daniel Schudel
dan.schudel at gmail.com
Sat Aug 7 16:58:59 EDT 2010
I use XEphem - http://www.clearskyinstitute.com/xephem/ - for all my custom
charts. If you are exclusively a MS Windows user - then it may not be for
you. It is nice to be able to define FOV circles (including telrad) and
include them on your plots.
Here is one that is web based and produces PDFs -
http://www.nightskyatlas.com/
And on the topic of atlases - I've been using this -
http://www.siaris.net/astro/atlas/ - but I am considering "The Cambridge
Star Atlas".
Thanks for your review Jon.
Daniel
--
Daniel Schudel
dan.schudel at gmail.com
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 16:19, BOBI and Mike GALLAGHER <vega13705 at verizon.net
> wrote:
> Neat stellar adventure, Jon!
>
> The comparison of the star atlases, got me thinking. Is there any handy
> software (maybe free:) where one could specify a rectangle in the sky and a
> limiting magnitude for a handy map of territory to explore with the scope?
> It seems that a box 5 degrees on a side down to 8th mag, for example would
> be helpful to bring along.
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jon Stewart-Taylor" <
> joncst at earthlink.net>
> To: <chaos-l at rtpnet.org>
> Sent: Thursday, August 05, 2010 1:18 PM
> Subject: [Chaos-l] Wil Tirion's _The Cambridge Star Atlas_
>
>
>
> Hi all. During my observing session last night at Farrington Point, i was
>> using a copy of Wil Tirion's _The Cambridge Star Atlas_ (which i'd checked
>> out of the library) to hunt things down. I currently use Tirion's _Bright
>> Star Atlas 2000_ as my main atlas, and was curious how the two compare,
>> especially since _BSA_ was out of print for some years. The first obvious
>> difference is that _TCSA_ has a moon map, listing about 250 craters as
>> well as the various mares. The map is inverted as per Newtonian 'scopes,
>> but at a scale perhaps more suited to binoculars. The monthly whole-sky
>> maps are divided per-hemisphere in _TCSA_, as opposed to the one-chart-fits
>> all approach in the _BSA_, and are are a pretty blue with the Milky Way in
>> a lighter blue. More importantly, there are 12 in _TCSA_, intended for use
>> from 9 to midnight, compared to 7 in _BSA_ labeled with the 16 month//time
>> combinations each of the 7 charts cover.
>>
>> The most important differences between _BSA_ and _TCSA_ are limiting
>> magnitude and scale. _BSA_ is a mag 6 atlas, and covers the sky in 10
>> full-page charts. _TCSA_ is a mag 6.5 atlas, and covers the sky in 20
>> full-page charts. _TCSA_ also lists fainter objects, some as faint as 12th
>> mag, in contrast to the usual mid 10th magnitude limit for BSA. These
>> differences mean that BSA is a better unaided-eye, binocular, and Telrad
>> reference, while _TCSA_ is a better finder-scope and telescope reference.
>> Using _TCSA_, i sometimes had to flip back and forth between pages to get
>> the layout of the bright stars used for Telrad hopping. Conversely, the
>> extra half magnitude, and especially the finer detail, helped in using the
>> finder to close in on the targets.
>>
>> The _BSA_ has a set of tables at the front, one listing all the Messier
>> objects and one each for the double stars, clusters, galaxies, and nebula
>> shown in the whole atlas. Both atlases (atlasi?) have tables for each
>> chart listing the objects on that particular chart. _TCSA_ has 4 charts at
>> the end showing the distribution of each kind of object over the whole sky:
>> kinda fun, but not something you'd refer back to all that often.
>>
>> Bottom line is that you probably don't need both of these. If you want
>> to do primarily unaided eye or binocular observing, _BSA_ is probably
>> better, especially given you can usually get it for under $12 including
>> shipping. For telescopic purposes, _TCSA_ has better charts. It also
>> costs about twice as much, on the order of $24 in hardback. Either is a
>> good choice to pair up with _Turn Left at Orion_.
>>
>> Hope this was useful.
>>
>> J.
>> --
>> Jon Stewart-Taylor: joncst at earthlink.net
>> Chapel Hill Astronomy: http://www.rtpnet.org/chaos
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Chaos-l mailing list
>> Chaos-l at rtpnet.org
>> http://rtpnet.org/mailman/listinfo/chaos-l
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Chaos-l mailing list
> Chaos-l at rtpnet.org
> http://rtpnet.org/mailman/listinfo/chaos-l
>
-------------- next part --------------
HTML attachment scrubbed and removed
More information about the Chaos-l
mailing list